Two compact tiered organizers, not one in two colors
Joseph Joseph lists the Bamboo Compact (SKU 85168) and the Compact Tiered in Stone (SKU 8500001) with different bodies and different minimum drawer heights. Treating them as color variants would hide a requirement that can rule one of them out of a drawer that takes the other.
Listed numbers side by side
| Bamboo Compact (85168) | Compact Tiered, Stone (8500001) | |
|---|---|---|
| Body, as printed | H2½ × W5 × D15¾ in | H2.4 × W5 × D15.6 in |
| Body, in metric | H6 × W12.2 × D39.8 cm | H6 × W12.6 × D39.7 cm |
| Maker’s minimum drawer height | 8cm (3¼ inches) | 9 cm (3.5 inches) |
Both bodies are about five inches wide and a little under two and a half inches tall, so a footprint check alone would rate them alike. The stated minimum drawer height differs, and the Stone model needs the taller drawer. That requirement is the larger difference between these two (the bodies also differ by 0.4 cm in width and 0.1 cm in depth), and the guide on stated minimum drawer height sets both against the other two records that state one. Sources: the manufacturer’s US product pages, read 2026-09-08.
The two records
Both models are in the comparison list with the figures above. The cards repeat the published dimensions and the stated minimum, so the numbers on this page and the numbers the check uses are the same numbers. What the two sets of figures mean against a real drawer is the rest of this page.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. Links marked “paid link” go to Amazon; the dimensions shown come from the manufacturer and do not change with commissions.
The two pages convert their own metric figures differently
Every figure above is published twice, once in centimeters and once in inches. The pages do not say which came first, but every inch figure matches its metric figure converted and rounded. Each page rounds consistently, and the two pages do not agree on how.
| Figure | Published in metric | Printed in inches | Printed figure is |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bamboo Compact | |||
| Body height | 6 cm = 2.362 in | 2½ in | 0.138 in larger |
| Body width | 12.2 cm = 4.803 in | 5 in | 0.197 in larger |
| Body depth | 39.8 cm = 15.669 in | 15¾ in | 0.081 in larger |
| Minimum drawer height | 8 cm = 3.150 in | 3¼ in | 0.100 in larger |
| Compact Tiered, Stone | |||
| Body height | 6 cm = 2.362 in | 2.4 in | 0.038 in larger |
| Body width | 12.6 cm = 4.961 in | 5 in | 0.039 in larger |
| Body depth | 39.7 cm = 15.630 in | 15.6 in | 0.030 in smaller |
| Minimum drawer height | 9 cm = 3.543 in | 3.5 in | 0.043 in smaller |
The Bamboo page rounds every figure up to the next quarter inch. The Stone page rounds every figure to the nearest tenth. Both bodies are listed at the same 6 cm tall, and that one metric figure is printed as 2½ in on one page and 2.4 in on the other.
On a body dimension the direction of the rounding is quiet: it makes the organizer sound slightly larger or slightly smaller than the centimeters say. On a minimum it is the whole verdict. Rounding a minimum up makes it stricter than the metric figure beside it, so the Bamboo’s printed 3¼ in asks for 0.100 in more drawer than its 8 cm does. Rounding to the nearest tenth lets the Stone’s minimum fall, so its printed 3.5 in asks for 0.043 in less drawer than its 9 cm does. Two products in one range, converted by two habits, and the difference lands on the stated minimum, where the direction of the rounding decides which side of the line a drawer falls on.
Where the printed five inches comes from
Both models print a width of 5 in and neither body is five inches wide. The Bamboo is 12.2 cm, which is 4.80 in. The Stone is 12.6 cm, which is 4.96 in. One printed figure covers a body 0.16 in narrower than the other.
The size check holds both records at the printed 5 in. For width that is the cautious reading: on both models the printed 5 in is the larger of the two published figures. A reader with 4.9 in of clear width is turned away for both models at any allowance, and the centimeters are printed above so that reader can see how close the call was. The site does not convert that gap into a verdict of its own, because the record checks against the inch figure the maker printed.
What the difference means in a real drawer
The size check reads both published figures for a minimum. Below the lower of the two it says the drawer is below the stated minimum and shows your measurement beside the maker’s figure. Between them it says the drawer sits where the printed inch figure and the metric one disagree, and asks for a second measurement. Above the higher of the two the requirement stops being the question.
| Clear drawer height | Bamboo Compact | Compact Tiered, Stone |
|---|---|---|
| 3.0 in | Below the stated minimum | Below the stated minimum |
| 3.2 in | Between the two figures — measure again | Below the stated minimum |
| 3.3 in | Clears both figures | Below the stated minimum |
| 3.5 in | Clears both figures | Between the two figures — measure again |
| 3.6 in | Clears both figures | Clears both figures |
From 3.15 in up to 3.5 in, exactly one of the two is still in the running, and it is the Bamboo. Below 3.15 in neither clears its own stated minimum. From 3.55 in up, both clear both of their figures and the choice between them is no longer a question of height. The band where the two part company is about 0.35 in wide, and a drawer is easy to measure to a tenth.
Clearing a stated minimum is not the same as fitting. The check still asks you to confirm that hinges, pipes, runners and other obstructions are clear and that the organizer can enter the opening in the stated orientation. Those two are yours to check in the drawer itself.
Not compared here
Material feel, how the finish wears, cleaning and capacity are usage properties; this site has no hands-on records for either model and makes no claim about them. The two models are listed at different prices, which this site does not track.
Check both against your drawer — See the full narrow-drawer comparison.